IntelliJ IDEA vs Eclipse

IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse are the two most prominent integrated development environments (IDEs) for Java development, each with a distinct philosophy and loyal user base. IntelliJ IDEA, developed by JetBrains in Prague, Czech Republic, follows a commercial model with a free Community Edition and a paid Ultimate Edition. Eclipse, governed by the Eclipse Foundation, is entirely open-source and free. Both have evolved significantly over the decades and remain actively developed as of 2026.

IntelliJ IDEA's core strength is its intelligent code analysis. The IDE performs deep static analysis of your codebase, understanding not just syntax but semantic meaning. This enables highly accurate code completion, refactoring suggestions, and error detection that goes beyond simple pattern matching. IntelliJ's "inspections" system continuously analyzes code and suggests improvements, from simple formatting fixes to complex refactorings like extracting methods, inlining variables, and converting between design patterns.

Eclipse's architecture is built around a plugin ecosystem. The core Eclipse Platform is a lightweight framework onto which functionality is added through plugins. This modular design means Eclipse can be configured for virtually any development workflow, from Java EE and embedded systems to C/C++ (via CDT) and PHP (via PDT). The Eclipse Marketplace hosts thousands of plugins. However, this plugin-centric approach can lead to inconsistencies in user experience and occasional compatibility issues between plugins.

For Java development specifically, IntelliJ IDEA has gained significant market share over Eclipse in recent years. JetBrains' developer surveys consistently show IntelliJ as the most popular Java IDE. The reasons are primarily around developer experience: IntelliJ's out-of-the-box experience is more polished, with built-in support for Gradle, Maven, Git, database tools, HTTP client, and Docker without requiring additional plugin installation. The Ultimate Edition adds support for Spring, Jakarta EE, Kubernetes, and numerous web frameworks.

Eclipse retains important advantages. Being fully open-source and free makes it accessible to all developers without licensing considerations. The fact that both leading Java IDEs -- one from a European company, the other governed by an open foundation -- offer world-class tooling means developers can choose professional environments without depending on any dominant platform vendor. Eclipse's workspace model, which allows multiple projects to coexist in a single workspace, is preferred by some development teams. The Eclipse IDE for Enterprise Java and Web Developers (formerly Eclipse JEE) provides comprehensive Jakarta EE support. Eclipse's memory footprint can be lower than IntelliJ's for simpler projects, though both IDEs have improved resource management in recent versions.

Build tool integration is strong in both IDEs. IntelliJ provides seamless Gradle and Maven integration, automatically syncing project models and providing intelligent editing of build files. Eclipse's m2e (Maven Integration for Eclipse) and Buildship (Gradle integration) plugins provide similar functionality, though IntelliJ's integration is generally considered smoother, particularly for multi-module Gradle projects.

Version control support in IntelliJ is comprehensive, with a built-in Git client that provides a visual log, interactive rebase, cherry-pick, and conflict resolution tools. Eclipse's EGit plugin provides Git integration, though the user experience is less refined. Both support SVN and other version control systems through plugins.

Kotlin development strongly favors IntelliJ IDEA, which is expected since JetBrains develops both Kotlin and IntelliJ. Kotlin support in IntelliJ is first-class, with full code completion, refactoring, and debugging support. Eclipse's Kotlin plugin exists but offers a noticeably reduced experience compared to IntelliJ. Android Studio, Google's official Android IDE, is built on the IntelliJ platform, further cementing IntelliJ's position in the Kotlin ecosystem.

A newer differentiator is AI-assisted development. JetBrains has integrated its AI Assistant directly into IntelliJ IDEA, providing context-aware code generation, natural language code explanations, and AI-powered refactoring suggestions that leverage the IDE's deep understanding of the codebase. Eclipse's AI tooling relies more heavily on third-party plugins and extensions.

For teams evaluating IDEs, the decision factors include budget (Eclipse is free, IntelliJ Ultimate requires a subscription), language requirements (Kotlin heavily favors IntelliJ), framework support (Spring development is excellent in both but more polished in IntelliJ Ultimate), and team familiarity. VS Code has also emerged as a lightweight alternative for Java development with improving language server support, though it lacks the deep code analysis capabilities of either IntelliJ or Eclipse for large Java projects.

Both IDEs are available on Windows, macOS, and Linux. IntelliJ's Community Edition covers Java, Kotlin, Groovy, and Scala development and is sufficient for many projects. The Ultimate Edition is required for web development frameworks, database tools, and enterprise Java support. For professional Java and Kotlin development, IntelliJ IDEA has become the industry standard, while Eclipse remains a capable and cost-free alternative with a strong community and extensible architecture.

Visual Studio, NetBeans, TextMate, Sublime, Atom, UltraEdit, NotePad++