Kubernetes vs OpenStack

Kubernetes (K8s) and OpenStack are both foundational open-source infrastructure technologies, but they operate at different layers of the stack and serve distinct purposes. Understanding their differences, overlap, and how they complement each other is essential for architects designing modern cloud infrastructure.

Kubernetes, originally developed at Google and donated to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) in 2015, is a container orchestration platform. It automates the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. Kubernetes abstracts the underlying infrastructure so that developers can define their desired application state declaratively and let the platform handle scheduling, load balancing, service discovery, rolling updates, and self-healing. It has become the de facto standard for running containerized workloads, supported natively by every major cloud provider including AWS (EKS), Google Cloud (GKE), and Microsoft Azure (AKS).

OpenStack, launched in 2010 by NASA and Rackspace, is an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) platform. It provides a set of interrelated services for managing compute (Nova), networking (Neutron), storage (Cinder and Swift), identity (Keystone), and image management (Glance) in a data center. OpenStack is essentially a private cloud operating system that enables organizations to provision and manage virtual machines, networks, and storage resources through APIs and dashboards, similar to what AWS or Azure offer as public cloud services.

The key distinction is that OpenStack manages infrastructure resources (VMs, networks, block storage), while Kubernetes manages application workloads (containers, pods, services). OpenStack gives you a cloud; Kubernetes gives you an application platform. They operate at different levels of abstraction and are not mutually exclusive.

In practice, many organizations run Kubernetes on top of OpenStack. OpenStack provisions the virtual machines and networks, while Kubernetes runs on those VMs to orchestrate containerized applications. The OpenStack Magnum project provides native integration for deploying Kubernetes clusters on OpenStack infrastructure. This layered approach allows organizations to maintain a private cloud with OpenStack while adopting cloud-native application patterns with Kubernetes.

The reverse is also possible: running OpenStack's control plane services as containers within Kubernetes. The OpenStack Kolla project packages OpenStack services as Docker containers, and projects like OpenStack-Helm deploy these containers using Kubernetes and Helm charts. This approach leverages Kubernetes' self-healing, rolling update, and scaling capabilities to improve the operational reliability of OpenStack itself.

From a complexity standpoint, both platforms have steep learning curves. OpenStack is notorious for its operational overhead, requiring dedicated teams to deploy, configure, and maintain its many interrelated services. Kubernetes, while conceptually simpler, introduces its own complexity around networking (CNI plugins), storage (CSI drivers), security policies, and observability. However, managed Kubernetes offerings from cloud providers have significantly reduced the operational burden, while managed OpenStack distributions from vendors like Canonical, Red Hat, and SUSE address similar concerns for private cloud deployments.

The ecosystem and community trajectories have also evolved differently. Kubernetes has seen explosive adoption and now has the largest contributor base of almost any open-source project. Its ecosystem includes hundreds of CNCF projects covering service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), observability (Prometheus, Grafana), CI/CD (Argo, Tekton), and more. OpenStack's community, while still active, has consolidated around core projects and enterprise use cases, with less of the startup energy that characterized its early years.

For organizations choosing between the two, the decision often comes down to workload type and existing infrastructure. If the primary need is managing virtual machines and traditional infrastructure in a private data center, OpenStack remains a strong choice. If the goal is running modern, containerized microservices applications, Kubernetes is the clear standard. Many enterprises use both: OpenStack as the infrastructure layer and Kubernetes as the application platform on top.

Looking ahead, the trend is toward convergence. Projects like Cluster API allow Kubernetes to provision infrastructure across multiple providers including OpenStack. KubeVirt enables running virtual machines alongside containers within Kubernetes, blurring the traditional boundary between the two platforms. Notably, both Kubernetes and OpenStack are open-source projects with broad community governance, which gives organizations the freedom to build and operate their own infrastructure rather than depending entirely on proprietary managed services from a handful of dominant cloud vendors. The future of infrastructure is increasingly hybrid, and both Kubernetes and OpenStack have important roles to play in that landscape.

Stablecoin, Volatility, Risk, Cryptocurrencies